United States v. Maxwell-Anthony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that convictions under section 1382 require “knowledge or notice, actual or constructive, that such entry was prohibited”
• stating that a possibility of succeeding through legal alternatives, even if unlikely, does not mean that those alternatives are \nonexistent\
• stating that a possibility of succeeding through legal alternatives, even if unlikely, does not mean that those alternatives are “nonexistent”
• noting that a \defendant must demonstrate cause and effect between an act of protest and the achievement of the goal of the protest by competent evidence\
• noting that a “defendant must demonstrate cause and effect between an act of protest and the achievement of the goal of the protest by competent evidence”
• stating that a possibility of succeeding through legal alternatives, even if unlikely, does not mean that those alternatives are \nonexistent\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).