Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/9/2001

United States v. Richard E. Driver

Citations

  • 242 F.3d 767
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3528
  • 2001 WL 228034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s knowledge of information in plea agreement renders inconsequential judge’s failure to reiterate that information
  • concluding that omissions from plea colloquy were harmless because most details were in written plea agreement
  • concluding that omissions from plea colloquy were harmless because most details were in written plea agreement
  • remarking that same failure would be harmless
  • “Even an established violation of Rule 11 can be harmless error ... and thus not a ‘fair and just reason’ to return to Square One”
  • \Even an established violation of Rule 11 can be harmless error . . . and thus not a `fair and just reason' to return to Square One\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Easterbrook, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

101 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.