United States v. Ricardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying plain error review on direct appeal to defendants’ argument that the district court’s statements “impermissibly chilled their constitutional right to testify” because defendants had failed to object at trial
• defendants’ substantial rights not affected where, “in light of the substantial amount of evidence . . . presented against [them], . . . the outcome of the trial would not have been different”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).