United States v. Regensberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two counts of securities fraud were not multiplicitous because each count embodied “groups of two separate transactions that are governed by different terms and conditions, involved different buyers, and occurred over different time periods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).