D.C. Circuit· 10/23/1973
United States v. Raymond Moore
Citations
- 486 F.2d 1139
- 158 U.S. App. D.C. 375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \there is definitely no Supreme Court holding\ of addiction as a defense
- characterizing such an interpretation as \an amplification and extrapolation of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Eighth Amendment advanced in the admittedly confused and divergent opinions in Robinson v. California and Powell v. Texas \
- Statement of Wilkey, MacKinnon & Robb, JJ.
- Statement of Wilkey, MacKinnon & Robb, JJ.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leventhal, Bazelon, Wright, McGowan, Tamm, Lev-Enthal, Robinson, MacKinnon, Robb, Wilkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)D.C. Circuit· 1979-07-10· cited 324×
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-01-09· cited 293×
- United States v. BarkerD.C. Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 279×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-07· cited 143×
- Bethea v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-09-27· cited 131×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 128×
- Robert Martin v. City of BoiseNinth Circuit· 2019-04-01· cited 122×
- United States v. James W. McCord Jr., A/K/A Edward J. Warren A/K/A Edward J. HamiltonD.C. Circuit· 1975-04-21· cited 119×
- John Doe v. William H. Webster, Director, FbiD.C. Circuit· 1979-10-17· cited 117×
- United States v. Bernard L. Barker, United States of America v. Eugenio R. MartinezD.C. Circuit· 1976-05-17· cited 99×
- United States v. Joseph B. DavisD.C. Circuit· 1977-04-06· cited 99×
- Chestnut v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-05· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. FieldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-09-15· cited 60×
- United States v. Vito M. PastoreSecond Circuit· 1976-06-21· cited 55×
- Loveday v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 52×
- United States v. Howard T. PooleD.C. Circuit· 1974-01-17· cited 49×
- United States v. Robert LyonsFifth Circuit· 1984-04-16· cited 48×
- The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (Norml) v. John E. IngersollD.C. Circuit· 1974-01-15· cited 41×
- State v. KleinWashington Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 38×
- United States v. Jose Gracia, Jr., Alberto Perez, and Ramon Saul SanchezSecond Circuit· 1985-02-14· cited 33×
Cites
121 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 2,432×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 851×
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 697×
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court· 1922-03-27· cited 605×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-12-16· cited 594×
- Durham v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-09-10· cited 486×
- United States v. RumelySupreme Court· 1953-03-09· cited 445×
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court· 1916-06-05· cited 374×
- Wilkerson v. UtahSupreme Court· 1879-03-17· cited 344×
- United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 339×
- United States v. Archie W. BrawnerD.C. Circuit· 1972-08-21· cited 318×
- O'Neil v. VermontSupreme Court· 1892-04-04· cited 298×
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 261×
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-01-03· cited 243×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.