E.D. New York· 3/1/2010
United States v. Ramirez
Citations
- 696 F. Supp. 2d 246
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17951
- 2010 WL 785994
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suppressing statements where investigating officer conducted additional interrogation to “strengthen the criminal case” against defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matsumoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 2,030×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 1,364×
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-04-06· cited 913×
- Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-13· cited 323×
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 279×
- United States v. Johnny Carter, Micheal BearamSecond Circuit· 2007-06-08· cited 134×
- United States v. Long Tong KiamThird Circuit· 2006-01-03· cited 65×
- United States v. Mariela Coronoto SilvaSecond Circuit· 1983-08-09· cited 45×
- United States v. Marvalene MoodySecond Circuit· 1981-05-12· cited 37×
- United States v. Mikelis KirsteinsSecond Circuit· 1990-06-27· cited 14×
- United States v. Pena OntiverosS.D. New York· 2008-04-18· cited 13×
- United States v. TudoranN.D. New York· 2007-03-08· cited 11×
- United States v. CohenE.D. New York· 2005-06-06· cited 7×
- United States v. PalacioD. Connecticut· 1990-02-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.