United States v. Ralph Garguilo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting theory that “the very fact of [the petitioner’s] conviction” is “proof of his counsel’s incompetence”
• “[T]he advisability of calling particular witnesses ... [is a matter] open to honest differences of opinion.”
• “A convicted defendant is a dissatisfied client, and the very fact of his conviction will seem to him proof positive of his counsel’s incompetence.”
• “The advisability of calling particular witnesses . . . [is a matter] open to honest differences of opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).