Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 2/6/2018

United States v. Quary

Citations

  • 881 F.3d 820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Magwood does not define the term “new judgment” and finding persuasive decisions from other circuits holding that a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) does not result in a new judgment
  • noting that Magwood does not define the term “new judgment” and finding persuasive decisions from other circuits holding that a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) does not result in a new judgment
  • distinguishing sentence reductions under § 3582(c) and the imposition of a new sentence, and holding that “the former do not qualify as new, intervening judgments”
  • discussing distinction between sentence reductions and sentencings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Lucero, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.