United States v. Quary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Magwood does not define the term “new judgment” and finding persuasive decisions from other circuits holding that a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) does not result in a new judgment
• noting that Magwood does not define the term “new judgment” and finding persuasive decisions from other circuits holding that a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) does not result in a new judgment
• distinguishing sentence reductions under § 3582(c) and the imposition of a new sentence, and holding that “the former do not qualify as new, intervening judgments”
• discussing distinction between sentence reductions and sentencings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Charles A. Armstrong v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 2021-02-05· cited 22×
• United States v. McKinney
  D. Kansas· 2019-05-09· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slack v. McDaniel
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
• Dillon v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 2,002×
• Magwood v. Patterson
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 932×
• Juan White v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-03-14· cited 75×
• Stanko v. Davis
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-08-10· cited 59×
• United States v. Piper
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-10-25· cited 52×
• United States v. Autry Jones
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-08-04· cited 30×
• United States v. Verdin-Garcia
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-06-03· cited 21×
• Christopher Sherrod v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-06-02· cited 9×