United States v. Puckett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming on plain error review where government admitted that it had breached plea agreement but defendant could not show prejudice
• affirming on plain error review where government admitted that it had breached plea agreement but defendant could not show prejudice
• noting that plain-error review applies to forfeited errors
• “A handful of this court’s cases, unfortunately, are inconsistent” with earlier precedent, and they are therefore “not controlling”
• “A handful of this court’s cases, unfortunately, are inconsistent” with earlier precedent, and they are therefore “not controlling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).