United States v. Demik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “conclusional allegations” and general claims are insufficient to establish ineffective assistance or to require an evidentiary hearing on that issue
• “conclusory allegations are insufficient to raise cognizable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel” (quoting Miller v. Johnson, 200 F.3d 274, 282 (5th Cir. 2000))
• “[C]onclusory allegations are insufficient to raise cognizable claims of ineffec- tive assistance of counsel.” (quoting Miller v. Johnson, 200 F.3d 274, 282 (5th Cir. 2000))
• “[C]onclusory allegations are insufficient to raise cognizable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.” (quoting Miller v. Johnson, 200 F.3d 274, 282 (5th Cir. 2000)
• “[C]onclusory allegations are insufficient to raise cognizable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.” (quoting Miller v. Johnson, 200 F.3d 274, 282 (5th Cir. 2000))
• conclusory allegations are insufficient to raise a cognizable claim of 16 ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).