United States v. Prokupek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying clear-error standard in 4 reviewing video evidence in suppression hearing from traffic stop
• reversing the district court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress on the basis that the officer’s testimony at the suppression hearing was clearly contradicted by his contemporaneous statements captured on the squad-car video recording
• “[Reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop cannot be based solely on the fact that a driver exits an interstate after seeing a sign indicating that a drug checkpoint lies ahead.”
• contemporaneous statements in a video recording

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).