Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 11/24/2008

United States v. Presley

Citations

  • 547 F.3d 625
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24049
  • 2008 WL 4964136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court considered the “need to avoid an unwarranted disparity” between the defendant’s sentence and a co-defendant’s sentence as “the most important consideration”
  • explaining that district courts may consider sentencing disparities between co-defendants if they so wish
  • instructing the government to file a supplemental memorandum after “expressing concern” about a sentencing disparity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Clay, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Presley

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.