Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 11/24/2008

United States v. Presley

Citations

  • 547 F.3d 625
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24049
  • 2008 WL 4964136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court considered the “need to avoid an unwarranted disparity” between the defendant’s sentence and a co-defendant’s sentence as “the most important consideration”
  • explaining that district courts may consider sentencing disparities between co-defendants if they so wish
  • instructing the government to file a supplemental memorandum after “expressing concern” about a sentencing disparity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Clay, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.