· 7/10/2006
United States v. Jeffrey Worley
Citations
- 453 F.3d 706
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17098
- 2006 WL 1880062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a Booker remand did not permit consideration of a defendant’s rehabilitative efforts subsequent to the original sentencing
- holding that a Booker remand did not permit consideration of a defendant’s rehabilitative efforts subsequent to the original sentencing
- holding a Booker remand did not permit consideration of the defendant’s post- sentencing rehabilitative efforts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daughtrey, Cook, Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.