Skip to main content
· 7/10/2006

United States v. Jeffrey Worley

Citations

  • 453 F.3d 706
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17098
  • 2006 WL 1880062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Booker remand did not permit consideration of a defendant’s rehabilitative efforts subsequent to the original sentencing
  • holding that a Booker remand did not permit consideration of a defendant’s rehabilitative efforts subsequent to the original sentencing
  • holding a Booker remand did not permit consideration of the defendant’s post- sentencing rehabilitative efforts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daughtrey, Cook, Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.