Supreme Court· 11/23/1964
United States v. Powell
Citations
- 379 U.S. 48
- 85 S. Ct. 248
- 13 L. Ed. 2d 112
- 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2194
- 14 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5942
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the above elements establish a prima facie ease for enforcement of an Internal Revenue Service summons
- holding that the government needs to show probable cause only when the taxpayer raises a substantial question that judicial enforcement constitutes an abuse of process
- recognizing that an agency “can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even just because it wants assurance that it is not” (internal quotation omitted)
- holding that once a prima facie case is made, a heavy burden is placed on the taxpayer to show an abuse of process or the lack of institutional good faith
- holding that agency may not subpoena documents already in its possession
- holding that agency may not subpoena documents already in its possession
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan, Douglas, Stewart, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1,036 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1989-03-07· cited 3,065×
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 1,201×
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 961×
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-01-09· cited 797×
- United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Sixth Circuit· 1994-04-04· cited 680×
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 677×
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court· 1978-06-19· cited 615×
- Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 589×
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 532×
- State Ex Rel. Hoover v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 530×
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 411×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 318×
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 1981-02-12· cited 293×
- United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 280×
- Garner v. WolfinbargerFifth Circuit· 1970-08-31· cited 278×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1988-08-26· cited 273×
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyFifth Circuit· 1982-08-13· cited 262×
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockSecond Circuit· 1996-01-02· cited 255×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court· 1950-02-06· cited 1,061×
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court· 1946-02-11· cited 1,024×
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court· 1964-01-20· cited 582×
- Grant Foster and Foster Construction C.A., Intervenors-Appellants v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1959-12-08· cited 98×
- De Masters v. ArendNinth Circuit· 1963-01-24· cited 52×
- Martin v. Chandis Securities Co.Ninth Circuit· 1942-05-29· cited 51×
- Cameron O'connor, Alias v. John A. O'connell, District Director of Providence District, Internal Revenue ServiceFirst Circuit· 1958-03-20· cited 36×
- Zimmermann v. WilsonThird Circuit· 1939-06-19· cited 33×
- David Lash, Treasurer, David's, Inc. v. Laurence A. Nighosian, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceFirst Circuit· 1960-02-29· cited 24×
- United States v. Bayard Edward RyanSixth Circuit· 1963-08-01· cited 18×
- In Re Andrews' Tax LiabilityD. Maryland· 1937-04-02· cited 15×
- In Re KeeganS.D. New York· 1937-03-05· cited 15×
- Globe Construction Co. v. HumphreyFifth Circuit· 1956-01-31· cited 13×
- In Re Brooklyn Pawnbrokers, Inc.E.D. New York· 1941-05-29· cited 9×
- Thibault v. FlynnMontana Supreme Court· 1958-05-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.