United States v. Pierre Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there can be no plain error to review when \neither the Supreme Court nor this [c]ourt\ had resolved the issue \beyond debate\
• holding there can be no plain error to review when “neither the Supreme Court nor this [c]ourt” had resolved the issue “beyond debate”
• noting that courts resolving the issue “saw fit to offer substantiative analyses . . . before reaching their conclusions”
• finding no plain error when “neither the Supreme Court nor this court” had resolved the issue presented and the issue was not “settled beyond debate”
• cited by McMillen and holding an error cannot be plain when “neither the Supreme Court nor this [c]ourt” has “resolved the issue ‘beyond debate’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).