United States v. Peter L. Mayotte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may impose a sentence to be served consecutively to a yet-to-be-imposed state sentence
• holding the - district court had authority to make a sentence consecutive to an anticipated state sentence and, on its face, giving no reason to think a different rule would apply for federal sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).