· 3/1/2022
United States v. Phillip Thomas
Citations
- 27 F.4th 556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dealing with a variance but making the point that “a local board familiar with local conditions” can deal understandingly with questions arising under a local by-law
- court reviews to determine whether board has engaged in “unreasonable” or “whimsical” exercise of its discretion
- no one is entitled to a variance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.