Skip to main content
· 3/1/2022

United States v. Phillip Thomas

Citations

  • 27 F.4th 556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dealing with a variance but making the point that “a local board familiar with local conditions” can deal understandingly with questions arising under a local by-law
  • court reviews to determine whether board has engaged in “unreasonable” or “whimsical” exercise of its discretion
  • no one is entitled to a variance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.