United States v. Petters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming for purposes of analysis that the district court's prohibition of the use of a witness's name during a pretrial proceeding was a partial closure
• district court has wide latitude to exclude evidence that is repetitive, only marginally relevant, or poses a risk of confusion of the issues
• affirming his conviction and 50-year prison sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).