Skip to main content
· 10/10/1995

United States v. Perez-Valdera

Citations

  • 899 F. Supp. 181
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14821
  • 1995 WL 603154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Congress strengthened the notice requirements in recognition of the severity of the consequences of an in absentia order
  • observing that, because consequences of alien’s failure to appear are more severe under § 242B, notice requirements under that sec- tion were “strengthened”
  • observing that, because consequences of alien’s failure to appear are more severe under § 242B, notice requirements under that section were ‘strengthened’
  • noting that receipt was not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.