Army Court of Criminal Appeals· 4/2/1999
United States v. Pattin
Citations
- 50 M.J. 637
- 1999 CCA LEXIS 51
- 1999 WL 238922
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding defense counsel’s “motion for a sanity board was merely a frivolous attempt to bootstrap a trial delay through the mechanism of a sanity board”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Squires
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 22,300×
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-03-22· cited 2,786×
- Salvatore G. Crisafi v. George E. HollandD.C. Circuit· 1981-06-17· cited 494×
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-26· cited 420×
- Amwest Mortgage Corporation, Doss & Cavett v. Judith Grady, Grand Capital Mortgage & Investment Co.Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-11· cited 59×
- Wear v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-07-22· cited 36×
- United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1965-12-30· cited 30×
- Lerch v. BoyerN.D. Indiana· 1996-03-25· cited 17×
- United States v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-09-29· cited 12×
- United States v. JancarekU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1986-05-13· cited 10×
- Ramos v. ThornburghE.D. Texas· 1989-07-21· cited 6×
- United States v. KishU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1985-05-13· cited 6×
- United States v. CollinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 1994-12-13· cited 5×
- United States v. JamesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 1997-12-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.