Skip to main content
· 4/4/1985

United States v. Olin Corp.

Citations

  • 606 F. Supp. 1301
  • 15 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20602
  • 23 ERC (BNA) 1366
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the rule regarding intervention in a parens patriae action [ ] is equally appropriate” in a res judicata preclusion case
  • holding that, when a citizen or subdivision of a state seeks to intervene in a suit in district court in which the state is already a party as parens patriae “[a] minimal showing that the representation may be inadequate is not sufficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Propst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.