United States v. Muyet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendants in a conspiracy case may not obtain the “... ‘whens’, ‘wheres’, and ‘with whoms’...” in a bill of particulars
• denying bill of particulars with respect to RICO conspiracy count where indictment provided those five pieces of information
• denying bill of particulars with respect to counts alleging violent acts in aid of racketeering .where the indictment set forth date of violent acts, names of defendants charged in the acts, and nature of each act
• “The defendants are not entitled to a bill of particulars setting forth the ‘whens,’ Vheres,’ and ‘with whoms’ regarding the Nasty Boys enterprise and conspiracy.”
• “If the information sought by the defendant is provided by the indictment or by some other pretrial disclosure, such as discovery pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a bill of particulars is not required.”
• jury questionnaire used for anonymous jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).