S.D. New York· 11/18/1996
United States v. Muyet
Citations
- 945 F. Supp. 586
- 1996 WL 640855
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendants in a conspiracy case may not obtain the “... ‘whens’, ‘wheres’, and ‘with whoms’...” in a bill of particulars
- denying bill of particulars with respect to RICO conspiracy count where indictment provided those five pieces of information
- denying bill of particulars with respect to counts alleging violent acts in aid of racketeering .where the indictment set forth date of violent acts, names of defendants charged in the acts, and nature of each act
- “The defendants are not entitled to a bill of particulars setting forth the ‘whens,’ Vheres,’ and ‘with whoms’ regarding the Nasty Boys enterprise and conspiracy.”
- “If the information sought by the defendant is provided by the indictment or by some other pretrial disclosure, such as discovery pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a bill of particulars is not required.”
- jury questionnaire used for anonymous jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leisure
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Bin LadenS.D. New York· 2000-03-15· cited 33×
- United States v. SattarS.D. New York· 2003-07-22· cited 28×
- United States v. GottiS.D. New York· 1999-03-16· cited 20×
- United States v. ZemlyanskyS.D. New York· 2013-05-20· cited 16×
- United States v. Sanford Ltd.District of Columbia· 2012-01-30· cited 15×
- United States v. ReinholdS.D. New York· 1998-02-06· cited 12×
- United States v. HardingS.D. New York· 2003-07-07· cited 11×
- United States v. RittwegerS.D. New York· 2003-04-23· cited 10×
- United States v. ChalmersS.D. New York· 2007-02-22· cited 9×
- United States v. KufrovichD. Connecticut· 1997-12-11· cited 8×
- United States v. DiazD. Connecticut· 2004-02-03· cited 6×
- United States v. OjeikereS.D. New York· 2004-01-17· cited 6×
- United States v. Ordaz-GallardoS.D. New York· 2007-10-17· cited 4×
- United States v. MorganS.D. New York· 2010-02-11· cited 4×
- United States v. NanceW.D. New York· 2016-03-08· cited 4×
- United States v. RW Professional Leasing Services Corp.E.D. New York· 2004-05-04· cited 3×
- United States v. MinayaS.D. New York· 2005-10-12· cited 3×
- United States v. DewarS.D. New York· 2007-06-04· cited 2×
- United States v. SchlesingerE.D. New York· 2005-03-18· cited 2×
- United States v. TavarezS.D. New York· 2007-10-11· cited 1×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 2,251×
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court· 1994-11-01· cited 687×
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 581×
- Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 370×
- United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezSecond Circuit· 1993-12-03· cited 366×
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A \l.v. Hong\Second Circuit· 1994-07-11· cited 322×
- United States v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 1985-03-11· cited 299×
- United States v. BarnesSecond Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 296×
- United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgSecond Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 230×
- United States v. TorresSecond Circuit· 1990-04-03· cited 224×
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraSecond Circuit· 1990-12-12· cited 219×
- United States v. CasamentoSecond Circuit· 1989-10-11· cited 208×
- United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, DefendantsSecond Circuit· 1988-07-18· cited 206×
- United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnSecond Circuit· 1983-01-28· cited 199×
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 177×
- McMahon v. GreenSupreme Court· 1985-10-07· cited 167×
- Williams v. ArmontroutSupreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 161×
- United States v. Robert Aulicino, Jr., David Cleary, and Louis Ruggiero, Jr.Second Circuit· 1995-01-05· cited 145×
Other cases named United States v. Muyet
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.