Skip to main content
First Circuit· 7/26/2017

United States v. Murchison

Citations

  • 865 F.3d 23
  • 2017 WL 3167621
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the bureau of prisons also uses this data to \classif[y] and process[] sentenced offenders\
  • mentioning that the bureau of prisons also uses this data to \classif[y] and process[] sentenced offenders\
  • explaining that a person whose conversations were unlawfully 1 § 2520(a)
  • holding 26 that the court was required to remand so the ALJ could follow up with the VE regarding a 27 claimant’s ability to perform an occupation involving DOT requirements that appeared to 28 be more than the claimant could handle
  • “[T]ogether, Rule 32 and the BOP’s system work to ensure that the BOP classifies and 2 processes sentenced offenders with the benefit of all relevant and informative sentencing material.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Stahl, Barron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Murchison

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.