United States v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 29 entitles the defendant “to a snapshot of the evidence at the point that the court reserves its ruling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Van Nguyen
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-04-02· cited 50×
• United States v. Tyson
  Third Circuit· 2011-08-03· cited 40×
• United States v. Richardson
  Third Circuit· 2011-09-23· cited 39×
• United States v. Kendrick Eugene Duldulao
  Eleventh Circuit· 2023-11-29· cited 26×
• State v. Selalla
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-01-02· cited 11×
• United States v. Benbow
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-08-18· cited 7×
• United States v. Demetris Hill
  Eleventh Circuit· 2024-10-04· cited 5×
• State v. Herrera
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-01-06· cited 3×
• Marlon Joel Rivera v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-06· cited 1×
• United States v. Yarbrough
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-01-02· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Robertson
  Eleventh Circuit· 2007-07-27· cited 223×
• United States v. Michael R. Bennett, William G. Bennett, Anastasio Cervantes, Eydler Castellano, Maximo Hildo Feijo-Garcia
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-07-07· cited 95×
• United States v. Terry Lanier, Samuel Stevens, Carl Jamerson
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-01-10· cited 25×
• United States v. O.Z. Howard, Alfred James, and Ceabon Jackson
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-03-01· cited 17×