Skip to main content
· 1/12/2018

United States v. Benbow

Citations

  • 709 F. App'x 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting letters rogatory to allow discovery from Canadian company with respect to purported class claims
  • noting the absence of “controlling Fourth Circuit precedent on [the] question” of mootness where “no certification motion is pending” and defendant argued “the complete settlement offer mooted Kensington’s claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.