United States v. Michael Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• doing the same and reviewing the district court's exclusion of testimony for abuse of discretion
• this court considers the jury charge as a whole to determine whether the instructions accurately stated the statutory elements
• the court considers the jury charge as a whole to determine whether the instructions accurately stated the statutory elements
• prosecutor improperly stated that defendant “lied ... under oath when he testified this morning”
• “District courts generally enjoy broad discretion in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, as well as in the realm of trial management, which is quintessentially the province of the district courts.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).