United States v. Armand Gravely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the government’s requested portions, “while perhaps not admissible standing alone, are admissible as a remainder of a recorded statement”
• noting that trial courts are granted broad discretion in dealing with possible jury misconduct
• holding prior inconsis- tent statement under FED. R. EVID . 613(b) need not be a flat contradic- tion, but must afford some \indication that the fact was different from the testimony of the witness whom it sought to contradict.\
• stating \the obvi- ous notion that parties should not be able to lift selected portions [of a recorded statement] out of context\
• analyzing a conviction for obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503
• analyzing a conviction for obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).