Sixth Circuit· 4/4/1990
United States v. Michael Lynn Smith
Citations
- 899 F.2d 564
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735
- 1990 WL 36269
Judges: Merritt, Krupansky, Graham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- John Doe, Inc. v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2008-12-15· cited 50×
- United States v. HannaSixth Circuit· 2011-08-12· cited 33×
- In the Matter of GolinskiNinth Circuit· 2009-11-19· cited 10×
- Kindhearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, Inc. v. GeithnerN.D. Ohio· 2010-05-10· cited 7×
- United States v. Bin LadenS.D. New York· 1999-06-30· cited 7×
- United States v. DuncanU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1992-06-09· cited 6×
- United States v. Anvari-HamedaniN.D. Ohio· 2005-07-25· cited 5×
- In re National Security LetterN.D. California· 2013-03-14· cited 5×
- United States v. MusaE.D. Missouri· 1993-09-24· cited 4×
- United States v. Sirous AsgariSixth Circuit· 2019-10-04· cited 3×
- In the Matter of Karen GolinskiNinth Circuit· 2009-11-19
- Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. v. SalazarFifth Circuit· 2013-04-09
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 991×
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court· 1948-04-13· cited 928×
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court· 1936-12-21· cited 830×
- United States v. WillSupreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 518×
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court· 1918-03-11· cited 467×
- Snepp v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-14· cited 285×
- United States v. SmithM.D. Tennessee· 1989-02-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.