Skip to main content
· 12/4/2013

United States v. Michael Henderson

Citations

  • 736 F.3d 1128
  • 2013 WL 6248392
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even though some factors supported corroboration, the district court did not err in excluding the statement after deciding the declarant was trying to help his friend
  • stating that determinations of trustworthiness, for purposes of the hearsay exception, are reviewable for clear error
  • “The question of whether the declarant made the statement implicates the testifying witness‟s credibility; making credibility determinations is a role reserved to the jury.”
  • “The question of whether the declarant made the statement implicates the testifying witness’s credibility; making credibility determinations is a role reserved to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Tinder, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.