Seventh Circuit· 12/31/2013
United States v. Phillip Rucker
Citations
- 738 F.3d 878
- 93 Fed. R. Serv. 293
- 2013 WL 6857989
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- circumstantial evidence can be used to establish knowing participation in a scheme to defraud
- circumstantial evidence can be used to establish knowing participation in a scheme to defraud
- circumstantial evidence can be used to establish knowing participation in a scheme to defraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Hamilton, Kapala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Lynn M. ReddittSeventh Circuit· 2004-08-20· cited 52×
- United States v. RobertsSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-07· cited 52×
- United States v. Gray, William C.Seventh Circuit· 2005-05-23· cited 38×
- United States v. RogersSeventh Circuit· 2008-09-04· cited 35×
- United States v. Mark P. HeathSeventh Circuit· 2006-05-15· cited 15×
- United States v. Michael HendersonSeventh Circuit· 2013-12-04· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.