United States v. Michael D. Stubbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is reasonably probable that but for the misinformation as to Defendant’s proper statutory sentence, Defendant would not have pleaded guilty.”
• “When the maximum possible sentence exposure is overstated, the defendant might well be influ- enced to accept a plea agreement he would otherwise reject.”
• “When the maximum possible sentence exposure is overstated, the defendant might well be influ- enced to accept a plea agreement he would otherwise reject.”
• “When the maximum possible sen- tence is overstated, the defendant might well be influenced to accept a plea agreement he would otherwise reject.” (empha- sis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]hese two statutory provisions call for significantly different statutory penalties . . . .”
• “[T]hese two statutory provisions call for significantly different statutory penalties . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).