Sixth Circuit· 2/5/2002

United States v. Michael D. Stubbs

Citations

279 F.3d 402
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1715
2002 WL 171233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[I]t is reasonably probable that but for the misinformation as to Defendant’s proper statutory sentence, Defendant would not have pleaded guilty.”
“When the maximum possible sentence exposure is overstated, the defendant might well be influ- enced to accept a plea agreement he would otherwise reject.”
“When the maximum possible sentence exposure is overstated, the defendant might well be influ- enced to accept a plea agreement he would otherwise reject.”
“When the maximum possible sen- tence is overstated, the defendant might well be influenced to accept a plea agreement he would otherwise reject.” (empha- sis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
“[T]hese two statutory provisions call for significantly different statutory penalties . . . .”
“[T]hese two statutory provisions call for significantly different statutory penalties . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Clay, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.