Fifth Circuit· 12/27/2002
United States v. McCarter
Citations
- 316 F.3d 536
- 2002 WL 31875277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that showing a quantitative disparity in the evidence and the mere presence of a spillover effect does not warrant severance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Duhé, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. StalnakerFifth Circuit· 2009-06-10· cited 120×
- United States v. LucasFifth Circuit· 2008-02-01· cited 96×
- United States v. TurnerFifth Circuit· 2012-03-07· cited 74×
- United States v. Jabori HuntsberryFifth Circuit· 2020-04-10· cited 61×
- United States v. Joshua KinchenFifth Circuit· 2013-09-05· cited 59×
- United States v. HickersonFifth Circuit· 2007-06-19· cited 8×
- United States v. AshleyFifth Circuit· 2024-12-12· cited 2×
- United States v. LucasFifth Circuit· 2009-06-10
- United States v. AshleyFifth Circuit· 2025-02-18
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Gregory O. DanielsD.C. Circuit· 1985-09-25· cited 138×
- United States v. Clarence JonesSecond Circuit· 1994-02-09· cited 127×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dung Manh NGUYEN, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 57×
- United States v. Steve Wayne Holloway and Edwin L. HinesFifth Circuit· 1993-12-09· cited 44×
- United States v. SinghFifth Circuit· 2001-08-10· cited 36×
Other cases named United States v. McCarter
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.