United States v. Maurice Bailey

Oral argument

• Argued

  39 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the propriety of vacatur and remand where there are material “ambiguities in th[e] record”
• explaining that when “a suppression motion has been denied, this Court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the government” (quoting United States v. Abdallah, 911 F.3d 201, 209 (4th Cir. 2018))
• “[When] an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be remand for further proceedings[.]” (quoting Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 293 (1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).