· 8/12/1955
United States v. Mantooth
Citations
- 6 C.M.A. 251
- 6 USCMA 251
- 19 C.M.R. 377
- 1955 CMA LEXIS 309
- 1955 WL 3456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in determining the applicability of the estoppel, the first consideration is “whether the issue of invalidity common to each action is substantially identical.”
- \It is significant that the Court [in Blonder-Tongue] placed the burden on the plaintiff-patentee to show that he did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosman, Lati, Mer, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.