Skip to main content
· 8/12/1955

United States v. Mantooth

Citations

  • 6 C.M.A. 251
  • 6 USCMA 251
  • 19 C.M.R. 377
  • 1955 CMA LEXIS 309
  • 1955 WL 3456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in determining the applicability of the estoppel, the first consideration is “whether the issue of invalidity common to each action is substantially identical.”
  • \It is significant that the Court [in Blonder-Tongue] placed the burden on the plaintiff-patentee to show that he did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosman, Lati, Mer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.