United States v. Bennington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that persons listed as witnesses by defendant but not called to testify supports an inference that the testimony would have been unfavorable to defendant
• “The degree of proof necessary to establish fraud demands more than a preponderance of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).