United States v. Mangum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that upward variance was reasonable where court made individualized assessment of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors based on facts presented and considered defendant’s proffered information
• holding that upward variance was reasonable where court made individualized assessment of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors based on facts presented and considered defendant’s proffered information
• concluding an upward variance was reasonable where the court made an individualized assessment based on the facts presented
• finding that an upward variance was reasonable where the court made an individualized assessment based on the facts presented
• explaining that a sentence is not unreasonable if the district court makes “an individualized assessment based on the facts presented” and addresses “the defendant’s proffered information in its consideration of the § 3553(a) factors” (citations to quoted cases omitted)
• upward variance is reasonable where court makes individualized assessment of § 3553(a) factors based on facts presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).