D.C. Circuit· 1/17/2014

United States v. Lyons

Citations

740 F.3d 702
2014 WL 185504
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the Fourth Amendment’s probable cause requirement is established “by an oath or affirmation and a neutral or detached magistrate mak[ing] a probable cause determination”
holding that an officer’s training-and-experience statement, coupled with other observations, sufficiently established a nexus between money and illegal betting records and the defendant’s residence
noting that “[n]othing in [the federal statute] requires that a wiretap application itself contain proof that it has been reviewed by the principal prosecuting attorney”
noting that Massachusetts law requires principal prosecuting attorney to “personally review” the wiretap application
finding no Fifth Amendment violation where prosecutor noted there was “no evidence at all” to support defense theory
stating that Neder applies to a Yates claim on direct review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kayatta, Lynch, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.