United States v. Lubich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prima facie showing of authenticity had been made by evidence that incriminating internet searches were made using defendant’s account
• noting that any flaws go to the weight of the evidence, not its admissi- bility
• noting that, once Rule 901’s standard had been met, the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine the government expert on “the possibility that someone else was sitting at a computer that [the defendant] previously logged onto and entered the information without her knowledge”
• explaining that authenticity and hearsay are distinct evidentiary issues
• computer data contained numerous references to appellant’s personal computer information satisfies MIL. R. EVID. 901(b)(4
• cit- ing United States v. Freeman, 65 M.J. 451, 453 (C.A.A.F. 2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Simmermacher
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2015-06-08· cited 27×
• United States v. Loiacono
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2014-03-27
• United States v. Tso
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-02-29
• United States v. Jones
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-02-08
• United States v. Barker
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2018-05-21
• United States v. Rollins
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-07-30
• United States v. Hamby
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-08-28
• United States v. Zoril
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-10-23
• United States v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2019-02-28
• United States v. Baas
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2019-04-15
• United States v. Howell
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2019-06-12
• United States v. Sandoval
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2020-04-13
• Alberto Julio Garcia a/k/a Alberto J. Garcia a/k/a Alberto Garcia v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2020-05-14
• United States v. Jones
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2020-12-23

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Freeman
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2008-02-01· cited 142×
• Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance
  D. Maryland· 2007-05-04· cited 113×
• United States v. Lino Catabran
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-01-06· cited 87×
• United States v. David Vernon Tank
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-01-04· cited 82×
• Ricketts v. City of Hartford
  Second Circuit· 1996-01-17· cited 49×
• American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Vinhnee (In Re Vinhnee)
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-12-16· cited 41×
• United States v. Maxwell
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-09-28· cited 23×
• United States v. Harris
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2001-09-24· cited 15×
• United States v. Richendollar
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-06-23· cited 7×
• United States v. Blanchard
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1998-09-02· cited 6×
• United States v. Lubich
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-09-06· cited 1×

Other cases named United States v. Lubich

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Lubich
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-09-06· cited 1×
• United States v. Lubich
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-06-15