· 12/16/2005
American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Vinhnee (In Re Vinhnee)
Citations
- 336 B.R. 437
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2602
- 2005 WL 3609376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that in deciding whether to admit business records, the authenticity analysis is merged into the business record analysis
- upholding trial court decision to require foundational evidence of reliability of American Express's computer hardware and software because statements proffered bore term “duplicate copy” as a result of being maintained electronically
- upholding rejection of electronic records where custodial witness was “vague, conclusory, and ... unpersuasive”
- upholding trial court decision to require foundational evidence of reliability of American Express's computer hardware and software because statements proffered bore term \duplicate copy\ as a result of being maintained electronically
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein, Montali, Perris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.