Skip to main content
· 12/16/2005

American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Vinhnee (In Re Vinhnee)

Citations

  • 336 B.R. 437
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2602
  • 2005 WL 3609376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in deciding whether to admit business records, the authenticity analysis is merged into the business record analysis
  • upholding trial court decision to require foundational evidence of reliability of American Express's computer hardware and software because statements proffered bore term “duplicate copy” as a result of being maintained electronically
  • upholding rejection of electronic records where custodial witness was “vague, conclusory, and ... unpersuasive”
  • upholding trial court decision to require foundational evidence of reliability of American Express's computer hardware and software because statements proffered bore term \duplicate copy\ as a result of being maintained electronically

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Montali, Perris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.