United States v. Lora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The relevant question, then, is not simply whether the price per kilogram was artificially low, but whether the government’s financial terms in general were artificially generous, or otherwise unrepresentative of market practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Goodwin
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 57×
• People v. Claypool
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2004-07-22· cited 44×
• United States v. Jaca-Nazario
  First Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 23×
• United States v. Cabrera
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-07-25· cited 9×
• Johnson v. Veneman
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-30· cited 8×
• United States v. Henry Ruiz
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-05-05· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-05-05
• United States v. Soriano
  S.D. New York· 2003-12-10
• United States v. Panduro
  Second Circuit· 2002-03-19

Other cases named United States v. Lora

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Lora
  Fourth Circuit· 2002-04-12· cited 1×
• United States v. Lora
  Fourth Circuit· 2004-07-16· cited 1×
• United States v. Lora
  Second Circuit· 1973-03-23
• United States v. Lora
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-03-18
• United States v. Lora
  Fourth Circuit· 2002-06-19
• United States v. Lora
  Third Circuit· 2008-11-19
• United States v. Lora
  Fourth Circuit· 2012-08-21
• United States v. Lora
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-04-23