· 3/17/2010
United States v. Llamas
Citations
- 599 F.3d 381
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5509
- 2010 WL 963195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[O]ne purpose of the report requirement is ‘to expeditiously weed out claims that have no merit.’ ” (quoting Loaisiga v. Cerda
- collecting cases: \Compare [ BP Chems. Ltd. v. Formosa Chem. & Fibre Corp.
- recognizing that we review restitution orders for abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motz, King, Agee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.