Skip to main content
· 3/17/2010

United States v. Llamas

Citations

  • 599 F.3d 381
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5509
  • 2010 WL 963195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[O]ne purpose of the report requirement is ‘to expeditiously weed out claims that have no merit.’ ” (quoting Loaisiga v. Cerda
  • collecting cases: \Compare [ BP Chems. Ltd. v. Formosa Chem. & Fibre Corp.
  • recognizing that we review restitution orders for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz, King, Agee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.