United States v. Lilley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is irrelevant that the defendant does not know “the precise number or common name of the rule, the book and page where it was to be found, or the date upon which it was promulgated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lloyd DIXON, Jr., Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1976-03-12· cited 127×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,560 United States of America v. David B. Charnay
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-07-08· cited 88×
• UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert SCHWARTZ, Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1972-07-17· cited 49×
• United States v. Reyes
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 47×
• State v. Martin
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 22×
• United States v. Jensen
  N.D. California· 2008-03-04· cited 7×
• United States v. Behrens
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-07-13· cited 6×
• United States v. Sloan
  S.D. New York· 1975-07-01· cited 6×
• United States v. Bryan Behrens
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-04-25· cited 4×
• United States v. Knueppel
  E.D. New York· 2003-11-17· cited 3×
• United States v. Allan L. D'honau, United States of America v. Gordon M. Copp
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-04-14· cited 2×
• United States v. Steven Fishoff
  Third Circuit· 2020-01-30· cited 2×
• United States v. Reyes
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-05

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• United States v. Guterma
  S.D. New York· 1960-02-02· cited 17×

Other cases named United States v. Lilley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Lilley
  Third Circuit· 1985-09-13