Skip to main content
· 10/2/1968

United States v. Lilley

Citations

  • 291 F. Supp. 989
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is irrelevant that the defendant does not know “the precise number or common name of the rule, the book and page where it was to be found, or the date upon which it was promulgated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.