United States v. Allan L. D'honau, United States of America v. Gordon M. Copp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellant was experienced in the stock market; it is a remote possibility that he did not know the actions prohibited by 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5 were contrary to law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).