United States v. Libby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Accordingly, the Court cannot preemptively constrain the government in any manner from making filings it deems appropriate, necessary, and permissible under Section 4.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Sunia
  District of Columbia· 2009-08-11· cited 101×
• United States v. Ferguson
  District of Columbia· 2008-09-03· cited 27×
• United States v. Coughlin
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-06· cited 21×
• United States v. Booker
  District of Columbia· 2009-05-07· cited 19×
• United States v. Slatten
  District of Columbia· 2014-07-29· cited 17×
• United States v. Hong Vo
  District of Columbia· 2013-09-23· cited 16×
• United States v. Hasston, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2015-11-19· cited 15×
• United States v. Al Farekh
  Second Circuit· 2020-04-16· cited 8×
• United States v. Libby
  District of Columbia· 2006-12-22· cited 5×
• United States v. McCallum
  District of Columbia· 2012-08-14· cited 4×
• Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-03-28· cited 1×
• United States v. Vo
  District of Columbia· 2013-10-11
• United States v. Yuen
  District of Columbia· 2009-08-11
• United States v. Michel
  District of Columbia· 2022-08-23
• United States v. Mostafa
  S.D. New York· 2014-01-17
• United States v. Malone
  District of Columbia· 2023-09-08
• United States v. Trump
  District of Columbia· 2023-10-06
• United States v. Trump
  District of Columbia· 2023-11-01
• United States v. Raymond
  District of Columbia· 2023-11-14
• United States v. Lemma
  District of Columbia· 2025-10-03