United States v. LeTourneau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Congress “clearly set forth the purpose of SORNA” and provided the Attorney General the power to promulgate regulations in only “the most limited of circumstances”
• finding no ex post facto violation and citing other district court cases coming to the same result
• finding no ex post facto violation and citing other district court cases coming to the same result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Juvenile Male
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-01-05· cited 24×
• United States v. Shenandoah
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-08-20· cited 20×
• United States v. Baccam
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-04-28· cited 17×
• United States v. Cotton
  District of Columbia· 2011-01-20· cited 16×
• United States v. Torres
  W.D. Texas· 2008-08-21· cited 14×
• United States v. Stevens
  D. Maine· 2008-09-19· cited 9×
• United States v. Trent
  S.D. Ohio· 2008-07-24· cited 9×
• United States v. Juvenile Male
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-09-10· cited 8×
• United States v. Samuels
  E.D. Kentucky· 2008-01-17· cited 6×
• United States v. Benevento
  D. Nevada· 2009-04-21· cited 6×
• United States v. Navarro
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-11-23· cited 6×
• United States v. Dean
  M.D. Alabama· 2009-03-06· cited 1×
• United States v. Phasung Lu Baccam
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-04-28
• United States v. Juvenile
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-09-10
• United States v. Juvenile
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-01-05
• United States v. Adam Shepherd
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-01-26

Other cases named United States v. LeTourneau

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Letourneau
  N.D. Ohio· 1996-07-01· cited 3×