United States v. Leatch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rejecting the 100:1 ratio because a court disagrees with congressional sentencing policy is not a substitute for applying the essential considerations of § 3553(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kimbrough v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 3,379×
• United States v. Pruitt
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-29· cited 60×
• United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-06-10· cited 41×
• United States v. Ricks
  Third Circuit· 2007-07-20· cited 20×
• United States v. Terri Pruitt
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-06-04· cited 10×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
• United States v. Mares
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-03-04· cited 1,982×
• United States v. Johnny Gunter
  Third Circuit· 2006-09-11· cited 572×
• United States v. Williams
  Eleventh Circuit· 2006-07-21· cited 268×
• United States v. Vincent Carnelius Eura, United States of America v. Vincent Carnelius Eura
  Fourth Circuit· 2006-02-24· cited 154×
• United States v. Angeles-Mendoza
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-04-26· cited 126×
• United States v. Pho
  First Circuit· 2006-01-05· cited 117×
• United States v. McCullough
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-08-10· cited 110×
• United States v. Miguel Tzep-Mejia
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-08-15· cited 80×
• United States v. Juan Castillo
  Second Circuit· 2006-08-16· cited 63×
• United States v. Jointer, John W.
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-08-09· cited 49×
• United States v. Pickett, Lorenzo
  D.C. Circuit· 2007-02-13· cited 35×
• United States v. Spears
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-12-05· cited 15×