United States v. Lavadius Faison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “in light of [a defendant’s] own admission of drug trafficking and the fact that the firearms were located close to the drug proceeds or cash with which to purchase drugs, he could not” “argue that the firearms … were clearly not related to drug trafficking”
• noting that the during-the-offense requirement was removed in 1991
• affirming two-level enhancement for possession of a firearm during a conspiracy
• weapons and drug proceeds and paraphernalia found together fourteen months after end of charged conspiracy were relevant conduct justifying § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement
• “If a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was possessed, increase by 2 levels.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).