Skip to main content
· 7/29/2005

United States v. Larry Flenoid

Citations

  • 415 F.3d 974
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15583
  • 2005 WL 1790130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The government argues that ‘[a] motion in limine is not a substitute for an objection and does not alone preserve error for review.’ We disagree.” (internal citation -11- omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Smith, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.