Skip to main content
· 4/3/2003

United States v. Patrick Lynn Walrath

Citations

  • 324 F.3d 966
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6359
  • 2003 WL 1740471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting three parole revocation documents because the prejudicial effect of the documents did not substantially outweigh their probative value
  • declining to address an argument that was not raised before the district court, in the briefs, or at oral argument
  • declining to address an argument that was not raised before the district court or in the briefs or at oral argument
  • listing factors that help identify impermissible jury coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Arnold, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.