United States Court of Military Appeals· 9/16/1955

United States v. Lanford

Citations

6 C.M.A. 371
6 USCMA 371
20 C.M.R. 87
1955 CMA LEXIS 290
1955 WL 3541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the distinction in labeling CCA action as clemency rather than judicial action “matters little, so long as it is clearly understood ... [that the Boards of Review maintain] the power to treat an accused with less rigor than their authority permits”
stating that the distinction in labeling CCA action as clemency rather than judicial action “matters little, so long as it is clearly understood . . . [that the Boards of Review maintain] the power to treat an accused with less rigor than their authority permits”
suggesting that intermediate appellate courts may grant clemency
suggesting that intermediate appellate courts may grant clemency
“This [fact] was raised during testimony of one witness during the investigation under Article 32, but was never asserted during any testimony at trial, so it cannot be considered. [Citing Bethea,]”
“This [fact] was raised during testimony of one witness during the investigation under Article 32, ..., but was never asserted during any testimony at trial, so it cannot be considered. [Citing Bethea.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosman, Latimer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.